Search for: "HARDING v. HAND" Results 1621 - 1640 of 6,599
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
   Similarly, anyone looking for translated versions of Homer or Dante is instantly met with what might be regarded, on the one hand, as an embarrassment of riches, given the numbers available, or as a stress-laden requirement to pick out for oneself the “best translation” even in the absence of his or her own capacity to read the language being translated.With regard to “translating” the 18th Century Constitution into a truly usable document in the 21st… [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 9:49 am by Amy Howe
Chief Justice Roberts announces opinion in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 7:56 am by Russell Spivak, Benjamin Wittes
Think only of how hard it was to resolve the cross-border data transfer issues between the United States and the United Kingdom. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:05 am by SHG
That is what Congress is there to do, not unelected bureaucrats who are handed a blank check by a Congress too lazy or paralyzed to do the hard work of fleshing out what they mean by their lofty laws. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
While Lessig treats Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 5:59 am by Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle
”   Removing it (or forcing its transfer to private hands) would seem hostile to religion. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am by sydniemery
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
DesignsRosie Burbidge published her last post as an official GuestKat, providing a tour of some recent design decisions, including Tynan v J4K Sports Ltd [2018] EWHC 3519 and Pulseon OY v Garmin (Europe) Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 138. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:19 am by Richard Hunt
Relative convenience for those without and without disabilities is hard to determine, especially for those who are not disabled. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:18 pm by Jonathan Shaub
The priority documents include, among other documents, (1) a memo and note drafted by James Uthmeier, a senior counsel in the Department of Commerce, and hand delivered to John Gore, the acting head of the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, and (2) the drafts of the Justice Department’s 2017 letter to the Department of Commerce formally requesting the inclusion of the citizenship question on the census as a mechanism for enforcing the Voting Rights Act. [read post]