Search for: "JOHN DOES 4-6" Results 1621 - 1640 of 3,673
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
[4]        This opinion focuses upon obligations which are subject to the 5‑year prescriptive period and the effect on the running of that period of sections 11(3) and 6(4) of the 1973 Act. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 10:00 pm by Bill Marler
 One inspection in 2016 scored 13 points, and two inspections 1n 2015 scored 6 and 11. [read post]
To put this in perspective, experts estimate a defense contractor with 600 employees should anticipate that a third-party compliance audit of its information systems and data will take three to six months, and this does not include the time needed to correct any deficiencies identified during the audit. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the January 6, January 13, January 19 and February 17 conferences)   Baston v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:00 am by Rick Houghton
But some experts, notably John Schilling of 38 North, reject the assessment provided by the South Korean and U.S. militaries. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:26 am by Schachtman
“Everybody complains about the weather, but nobody does anything about it. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 8:21 am
It names ECUSA and its corporate arm, the DFMS, as defendants, along with 30 unidentified "John Does", who allegedly participated in some manner in the actions alleged.Herewith are some pertinent extracts, with my annotations in between:6. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:41 am by Dennis Crouch
Supreme Court’s Presumption of Judicial Review Since the days of Chief Justice John Marshall, the Supreme Court has relied on a strong presumption that judicial review is available for executive branch action.[4] Agency decisions are presumed to be reviewable, and preclusion statutes are construed narrowly. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:03 pm by Robert J. Fleming
However, it does illustrate the TYPES of damages that insurance adjusters for the negligent dog owners simply want to ignore. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 6:00 am by Daniel Byman
But does that mean they will be a disaster, or might they be a breath of fresh air? [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 11:47 am
’ In re Brooks, 324 S.C. 105, 108, 477 S.E.2d 98, 99 (1996) (citing In re Fullwood, 322 S.C. 1, 6, 471 S.E.2d 151, 154 (1996); In re Kennedy, 254 S.C. 463, 465, 176 S.E.2d 125, 126 (1970)). [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists Happy New Year, everyone! [read post]