Search for: "John J Downes"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 2,471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2025, 1:07 pm
Allen, Sen. and former Ambassador to the United Nations John C. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 9:00 pm
In particular, the United States government could have shut down starting last weekend, with offices closed, millions of government workers furloughed, and millions of others being required to work without pay. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 9:09 am
Meanwhile, Morgan Stanley CEO John J. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 4:32 pm
We had a post by John Jewell describing it as “the latest chapter in a new era of investigative reporting”. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
When this first use analysis is broken down between men and women, the result becomes even more fragile. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 4:53 am
Sergey Radchenko, a professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, said the statement appeared to telegraph “a reproach to the Russians, that they’re not acting like a great power, that they are creating instability. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am
Bruce Church, Inc. test), under which a regulation may be struck down if "the burden imposed on such commerce is clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits,"[19] might limit such state laws in some measures, as applied to small retailers.[20] In the tax context, Wayfair recognized that the "burdens [of having to collect state sales tax] may pose legitimate concerns in some instances, particularly for small businesses that make a small volume of sales to… [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:42 pm
Firstly, the Mostyn J judgment authorising the c-section. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am
On 20 July 2016, Dingemans J handed down judgment in the case of Ghuman v Ghuman [2016] EWHC 1783 (QB). [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:24 am
Meinert, Clinical Trials Dictionary (Johns Hopkins Center for Clinical Trials 1996). [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
State-Wide — Pennsylvania Supreme Court — 1 Retention Only one Supreme Court position is on the ballot, and it’s the retention voter for Justice J. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
It suggests that bipartisan norms of cooperation have all but broken down. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm
Cynthia J. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 12:04 pm
He described the process of using a John Doe suit to obtain the subscriber information for the IP address MediaSentry identified from Cox Communications and sent a letter to J. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm
In the Courts On 18 February 2014, Tugendhat J handed down judgment on the security for costs application in the case of Ontulmus v Collett ([2014] EWHC 294 (QB)). [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 10:37 am
” Questions of self-determination (or ‘autonomy’ in the literature) and professional responsibility can be addressed, as Hollis suggests, in the context of George’s point of view, from the “bottom up,” which at some point confront questions of medical ethics posed from the “top down. [read post]
