Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P" Results 1621 - 1640 of 5,342
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2018, 1:10 am by Jelle Hoekstra
Urol. 159(5) Suppl., p. 327, abstract No. 1256D5 Extract from Lexikon Medizin 1997, p. 1180D7 Huard et al. 1998, J. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
Kimberly McCauley is a California anti-vaccination activist, who has been in the news expressing her views. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 7:00 am by Sam Brunson
In the 1986 Bluebook, p. 829, the Joint Committee on Taxation provides what it says is an exhaustive list of these excludable military benefits. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 5:50 am by Richard Hunt
§12182(b)(2)(A)(iv) requires removal of architectural barriers when it is readily achievable. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 10:54 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
P. 30(b)(6) on certain issues, eventhough he had retired from Merck in 2010. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
For instance, plaintiffs alleging false or misleading corporate statements in the context of an initial public offering (“IPO”) almost invariably challenge these same statements under both Section 11 and Section 10(b). [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 8:54 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
P. 12(b)(6) of itsclaim for patent infringement, holding that the claims ofU.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:14 am by John Jascob
As currently structured, Pivotal will not be included in the S&P 1500 Composite or its component indices, including the S&P 500. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 1:29 pm
  The appellants further argued that the claimed subject matter represented a technological improvement over the previous state of the art in digital assistants. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
No matter what the nomenclature, cryptocurrency tokens will likely fall under SEC scrutiny, because the definition of security is extraordinarily broad with a presumptive, rich and storied history favoring SEC jurisdiction. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It’s a silly Q.When you look at enforcement, a lot of times the P is objecting not entirely because of confusion but b/c of use on goods/in ways the P doesn’t like. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 2:00 am
(Emphasis in original.)The examiner answered that:[P]reemption is not the test for judging subject matter eligibility under the Alice analysis. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 2:00 am
(Emphasis in original.)The examiner answered that:[P]reemption is not the test for judging subject matter eligibility under the Alice analysis. [read post]