Search for: "MURPHY V US" Results 1621 - 1640 of 1,829
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2016, 7:02 am by Joy Waltemath
The contractual intent of the parties was not dispositive in the independent contractor versus employee analysis, and facts pointing to independent contractor status did not alter the economic realities of his relationship as a hospital employee (Murphy v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
Murphy 207 NY 240 : 100 NE 742 (1913); City of Rock Springs v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:30 am by Yvonne Daly
Although the legal premise for such cases arose in the 1980s (see, for example State (O’Connell) v Fawsitt [1986] I.R. 362 and Murphy v DPP [1989] I.L.R.M. 71) real interest in the “missing evidence” concept as a method to seek to force the prohibition of an impending trial did not gather pace until the early 2000s. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
As used in this paragraph, "laser sighting system or device" means any system or device that is integrated with or affixed to a firearm and emits a laser light beam that is used to assist in the sight alignment or aiming of the firearm. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:38 am by Jennifer González
However, the precise definition of obscenity was unclear, and the Supreme Court would not rule that obscenity was not constitutionally protected speech until Roth v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:05 pm by bndmorris
Alyson Outenreath’s article Use of Disregarded LLCs by I.R.C. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Friends, we are excited to share that the Supreme Court has just taken up Gonzalez v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 2:33 pm
(For those interested, there is a long analysis of the concept of using outside counsel by Michael Dorf at Dorf on Law, an analysis directly at odds with this April 6, 2007 blog by Beck/Herrmann;)TortsProf has the jury verdict in a suit against basketball star Allen Iverson's bodyguards;This New York medical malpractice verdict comes courtesy of doctor-attorney Dainius Drukteinis, from NY Emergency Medicine, and involves the amputation of two fingers and delays in the ER with respect… [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 3:41 pm
A more likely interpertation is, that materials purchased for mass production of such videos crossed state lines, is what Congress had in mind, not the construction used to charge Blum in this case.For reasons that are a mystery to this writer, it seens this was not brought up on appeal, and the appeals court went off on a tangent of possession of child porn, see appellate court decision: USA -v- Gregory Blum . [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Murphy, both professors at New York University School of Law) to impose an affirmative consent requirement in defining sexual assault. [read post]