Search for: "Matter of M C B"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 3,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2013, 5:05 pm
What’s more, even if subsection (3) operates as intended, I’m not sure it interacts effectively with subsection (1). [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 11:55 am
(Note that Brad Benbrook, Steve Duvernay, and I were hired by the Firearms Policy Coalition to be the lawyers for the plaintiffs, so I’m reporting on this in my capacity as a lawyer, not as an academic.) [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 2:00 am
Even with a main line to the C-suite, HR can often find that they have trouble getting through to the leaders on important matters. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 2:07 pm
” At first glance, Professor Volokh’s argument seems logical, but its logic is abstract: A::B as C::D. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 7:39 am
Section 10a(c) of the Consumer Fraud Act authorizes a private right of action for “[a]ny person who suffers actual damages as a result of a violation of [the] Act. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am
It remitted the matter to the Family Court for a new hearing and determination. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 1:57 am
Finland, paragraph 48); (c) in less important matters (Jussila v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm
You’ve got a week and a bit to get your shit together otherwise I’m blowing the airport sky high! [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Buzbee, Hari M. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 6:43 am
McLaughlin, Jack B. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 6:36 am
Quantum computing; b. artificial intelligence; c. precision medicine; d. diagnostic methods; e. pharmaceutical treatments; and f. other computer-related inventions (e.g. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm
But one reason is that, b/c of quirk of design patent law, they got to look at the prior art. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 11:01 am
Courts don’t like institutional litigation b/c they think they’re distorting—school busing, for example, pits particular groups against each other—but they don’t notice that IP cases are institutional litigation. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 12:43 pm
I'm much more interested in figuring out how we can stop suing each other. [read post]
29 May 2020, 9:04 am
The EO has no immediate consequences that matter. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:00 pm
The other key point is subsection 2(1)(e) of the regulations which reads "as a student in training for an occupation mentioned in clause (a), (b), (c), or (d)". [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:18 pm
P. 166a(b), (c); Frost Nat'l Bank v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:06 am
Long Eminent Scholars Academic Chair, Louisiana State University (LSU) Paul M. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 7:27 am
Abbott has endorsed.To be clear: Personally, I'm one of the 61 percent of Texans who would legalize pot tomorrow; this summer I witnessed the Canadian model first-hand and considered it a brilliant success. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:37 am
The Commission decision even contained two fallbacks: a Plan B, where the relevant amounts of money would have been approximately 10% of Plan A, and a totally unspecified Plan C. [read post]
