Search for: "Miller, v. United States" Results 1621 - 1640 of 2,645
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2012, 7:04 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Vita-Mix loses an appeal to the CAFC:Vita-Mix Corporation (“Vita-Mix”) appeals from the district court’s final judgment in which the court con-cluded that Vita-Mix infringed the asserted claims of two United States patents, K-TEC, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Russell Beck
Nevada: The United States District Court for the District of Nevada held in Switch Communications Group v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
United States (11-9540, grant limited to the first question raised). [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm by INFORRM
, pp. 29-34(6) Ivan Hare Measuring Media Plurality in the United Kingdo [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 12:26 pm by Viking
Article I, section 9 of the United States Constitution states in relevant part that “[n]o Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed,” and, in its opinion in Calder v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:04 pm
State Department’s mandatory retirement at age 65 of certain employees policy violates Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA)  Miller v Clinton, United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, Docket #10-5405 The United States Department of State terminated the employment of John R. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:11 am
For the very sensible reasons explained by the Supreme Court of the United States in Powell v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:30 pm by Robert Wagner
Stinger Systems, Case No. 2:09-cv-289, in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada—alleging a number of claims, including violations of the Lanham Act. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
In the final petition consolidated in the Branzburg proceedings, the Court considered the petition for certiorari of the United States from a decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Caldwell v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 11:42 am by Howard Friedman
On the same day the conviction was announced, Janet Jenkins filed a civil suit in federal district court in Vermont seeking damages and an injunction ordering return of the kidnapped child to the United States. [read post]