Search for: "People v High"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 15,043
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2022, 9:21 am
As this Kat reported here, a High Court in Gauteng Division in 2021 granted a motion filed by BlindSA in Blind SA v Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition (14996/21) challenging the constitutionality of South Africa's current Copyright Act on the grounds that the statute limits people with visual and print disabilities from accessing copyright-protected materials in formats such as Braille, among others.Ramifications?? [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 7:31 am
The French version defines news content as “Contenu – quel qu’en soit le support, notamment audio ou audiovisuel – qui rend compte de tout enjeu ou événement actuel d’intérêt public, l’explique ou fait suite à une enquête sur un tel enjeu ou événement. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
The risks are high, and it’s not clear that the individual rewards of gun ownership are worth it. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 11:50 am
Most people don’t know this. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 6:27 am
First, people who are prescribed lots of opioids are likely to be disabled. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 5:31 am
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 2:15 pm
UNGA’s high-level week commenced on Sept. 13. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:34 pm
On May 9, 2022, a Fifth Circuit panel heard oral argument in Community Financial Services Association v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:52 am
These computer packages courses were offered at Kshs7,000 (approximately $60).Wanjiru argued that the motive of using the photograph was commercial gain seeing as people would pay to take the advertised courses and that the use of her image resulted in people assuming that there was an employment or a brand ambassador contract between the parties when there was none. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 4:34 pm
GermanyDer Dritte Weg v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 1:01 pm
Thought For Day I see all these old people who don’t have anything to do but eat, drink and sleep. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 9:14 am
In the 1973 case of Roe v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
Under People v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 3:16 pm
The post Nicki Minaj v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 6:11 am
Because disqualification is not mandatory here, the judge ‘is the sole arbiter of recusal’ (People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403, 405 [1987]) even if a party objects to the judge’s participation. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
It helps offset high business tax costs and makes Massachusetts more attractive to high earners and entrepreneurs. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 1:50 pm
I haven’t looked comprehensively at state cases, but some of the cases that I stumbled on, or that are frequently discussed in the other cases in this area, are summarized below: People v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 8:35 am
The Twitter v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
” Later, Chief Justice John Marshall also was burned in effigy after writing the famous opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am
A firm might want to deliver high-end advertisements to wealthy neighborhoods, or to deliver coupons when customers enter the mall, or offer a Burger King discount at a McDonald's, or promote farm-related software in rural areas.[5] In addition, online firms seek to segment markets geographically so that they can price discriminate based on differences in wealth or product demand by geography. [read post]
