Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 178,347
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2011, 6:58 am
We can’t provide any commentary or analysis, because of our firm’s involvement in the litigation. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 11:50 am
Additionally, the court considered the plaintiff’s own complaint, which referred to the commission as a “municipal commission. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:22 pm
The fence was installed by the previous owner of the defendant’s property. [read post]
11 May 2008, 4:32 pm
Blogger's note: Loving v. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 3:25 pm
The plaintiff settled with the other driver’s insurer for the liability limits of their policy. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:29 am
The tribunal determined that the plaintiff’s offer of proof, which consisted only of two handwritten pages restating the plaintiff’s allegations, was insufficient. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:05 pm
In Gulbrandsen the trial judge, in reasons indexed at 2013 BCSC 959, initially awarded the plaintiff costs up to the date of the defendant’s offer to settle, and double costs to the defendant thereafter. [read post]
17 May 2018, 4:15 am
On July 29, 2015, the plaintiff’s doctor cleared him to return to work with no restrictions, and the plaintiff returned to work that same day. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:47 am
Ultimately it boiled down to the peculiar circumstances of the case and plaintiffs' attorney's understanding of what was on offer. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 4:44 am
The discovery rule is sometimes available to the plaintiff. [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 10:28 pm
The house was owned by her daughter and son-in-law and the land was owned by the plaintiff’s husband. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:57 am
The post Matthew McNicholas and Patrick McNicholas Named Among Lawdragon’s 500 Leading Plaintiff Employment & Civil Rights Lawyers 2022 List appeared first on McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 6:07 am
In short, the Court of Appeals (Chin, Robinson and Carney) finds that plaintiff suffered an adverse action, even under the Second Circuit's strict "materiality" test that considers whether the plaintiff suffered a significant change in circumstances, either through loss of pay, a demotion, termination, or a transfer that denies the plaintiff certain privileges. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 7:20 pm
"Presumably it is plaintiffs' view that the creation of this "uncertainty" violates their Fourteenth Amendment rights: Davis's "intentional creation of such uncertainty surrounding the exercise of a fundamental right like marriage," they write, "--an uncertainty not faced by couples in other counties – is a significant burden and injury that Plaintiffs and members of the putative class ought not bear. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:09 am
” Without considering the plaintiff’s response to the motion, the trial court decided that the roadway was reasonably safe and that the plaintiff did not sufficiently respond to the defendant’s motion, ultimately dismissing the plaintiff’s case. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 7:02 am
The plaintiff’s husband conveyed the carport lot to the plaintiff before his death later that year. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 7:02 am
The plaintiff’s husband conveyed the carport lot to the plaintiff before his death later that year. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 6:50 am
” The plaintiff further framed the class’s harm from violations as “irreparable harm as a result of the defendant’s unlawful and wrongful conduct,” and that “Plaintiff and members of the class continue to be exposed to an elevated risk of identity theft. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 6:50 am
” The plaintiff further framed the class’s harm from violations as “irreparable harm as a result of the defendant’s unlawful and wrongful conduct,” and that “Plaintiff and members of the class continue to be exposed to an elevated risk of identity theft. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 6:50 am
” The plaintiff further framed the class’s harm from violations as “irreparable harm as a result of the defendant’s unlawful and wrongful conduct,” and that “Plaintiff and members of the class continue to be exposed to an elevated risk of identity theft. [read post]
