Search for: "Pool v. State"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 2,948
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2014, 8:00 am
Making Sense of the Electronic Medical Records with the Audit Trail Hospital Fails to Adequately Monitor Pregnant Mother – $11.5 Million Awarded for Death of Unborn Child and Organ Loss of Mother in Miller v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
So I follow Lessig and Pozen in holding not only that apportioned delegates should be chosen in special elections, and they should not be identified with political parties on the ballots – although I am open to Levinson’s suggestion to select delegates from each state by lottery from a qualified pool of citizens, as long as they could each take one non-voting expert with them (compare Vile p.140). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
And even when juries are empaneled and empowered in federal courts, the jury pool from which they are drawn is the federal district (rather than a county as in state court), which can result in profound demographic differences in the makeup of the jury. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 9:00 pm
Kitsilano Coalition v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:14 am
(Patent Docs) (Holman's Biotech IP Blog) US: AMP v USPTO after Bilski v Kappos (Patent Docs) US: NORD Chair/HP&M Director presents opening testimony at first ever FDA orphan drug hearing (FDA Law Blog) US: Celsis files patent infringement complaint against CellzDirect and Invitrogen over pooled multi-cryopreserved hepatocyte products (Patent Docs) Products Astelin (Azelastine) – US: Zydus admits infringing Meda’s Astelin patent, agrees not to… [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 6:03 pm
(Patent Docs) (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog) US: AMP v USPTO after Bilski v Kappos (Patent Docs) US: NORD Chair/HP&M Director presents opening testimony at first ever FDA orphan drug hearing (FDA Law Blog) US: Celsis files patent infringement complaint against CellzDirect and Invitrogen over pooled multi-cryopreserved hepatocyte products (Patent Docs) Products Astelin (Azelastine) – US: Zydus admits infringing Meda’s Astelin patent, agrees not to… [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
Wollschlaeger v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Gubeladze, heard 12-13 Mar 2019. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
The staff stated then that these are treated as vesting on the regular vesting schedule (unless the holder has actually retired). [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 5:00 am
State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 11:00 pm
The Court of Appeal in the case of Arewa Textiles Plc & Others v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in King v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
In Young v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 1:02 pm
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the Michigan district court's ruling in Keith v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 6:15 pm
Cummings v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:03 am
The Court will not reach the merits of the DAPA case, United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 9:46 am
Texas to Baze v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
At the very end of last week’s oral argument in Flowers v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:00 pm
_____________________________________________________________________________As the White v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:21 am
See Maloney, et al. v. [read post]
