Search for: "STATE v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION" Results 1621 - 1640 of 5,211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2015, 5:00 am by Kirk Jenkins
Justice Freeman asked whether the Court’s decision in Board of Education of School District No. 150 v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 12:05 pm by David Urban
Board of Education, a faculty member can only succeed on a First Amendment claim if, on balance, his or her interest “in commenting upon matters of public concern” outweighs “the interest of the State, as an employer, in promoting the efficiency of the public services it performs through its employees. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm by Howard Knopf
This was preceded by the Court’s 2015 decision in Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 6:00 am by alysondrake
She was an active member of many boards and agencies, allowing Justice Sotomayor to be extremely influential in reforms of all kind. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
 Bill Baird remembers the events that produced Eisenstadt v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" As the United States Supreme Court commented in Pickering v Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563* “Free and unhindered debate on matters of public importance constitutes a core value of the First Amendment. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Labor Law §511 sets out additional exclusions, including students and students' spouses at educational institutions [see §511 subdivisions 15 and 17] and independent contractors. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm by Brian Clarke
Board of Education, 333 U.S. 203 (1948) (quoting Thomas Jefferson’s Letter to the Danbury Baptist Association dated Jan. 1, 1802); Reynolds v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am by Howard Knopf
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am by Howard Knopf
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
"In formulating his ruling, Justice Devine noted the decision by the Appellate Division in Civil Service Employees Ass'n v New York State Public Employee Relations Board, 46 AD3d 1037, but concluded that the decision was not a controlling precedent in this case. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:18 am by GSU Law Student
(n.d.). https://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/justice-thurgood-marshall-profile-brown-v-board Brown v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Moms for Liberty, a controversial Florida-based political action group started by two former school board members and a Republican activist, has made parental rights its rallying cry and is hoping to harness anger over mask mandates and diversity education in schools into power at the polls. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:30 am
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in Wiesmueller v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:13 pm by Mike Underwood
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm by Howard Knopf
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm by Howard Knopf
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]