Search for: "State v. Brain " Results 1621 - 1640 of 2,675
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2010, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
, This Just Taxes My Brain, Tax Bureaucrats Lose Work, Keep Pay, Testing Tax Bureaucrats Just Part of the Solution, A Citizen Vote on Taxes, Freezing Real Property Tax Reassessments: A Nice Idea, The Tax Price of a Flawed Tax System, Can Bad Tax Administration Doom the Tax? [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:55 am
The Coordinator met with Title V, Medicaid, the DD Council, ICC, state legislators and Iowa's congressional delegation, as well as representing our children with other parent, disability and child advocacy organizations. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:09 am by Steve Hall
My wife's brains were splattered all over the bedroom, the ceiling. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
  On 6 December 2019 Warby J heard an application in the case of United Kingdom Independence Party Ltd v Braine & Ors. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 4:28 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
The Riverside County Superior Court just granted a motion filed by Compassion & Choices on behalf of two terminally ill Californians seeking to intervene in the Ahn v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 1:09 pm
  It focused heavily on the Twombly decision, and on a more recent sequel (Pacific Bell v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
She would have held that the Oregon Supreme Court had faithfully applied Gore and State Farm v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 12:16 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The infant's internal injuries included: a subarachnoid hemorrhage, bleeding in the area between the brain and the thin tissues that cover the brain, and a subdural hemorrhage, bleeding due to a rupture of blood vessels in the space between the surface of the brain and the thin layer of tissue that separates the brain from the skull, which resulted in "traumatic brain injury." [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm by Schachtman
  The Harris Court cited, with approval, a 2002 traumatic cancer case, State ex rel. [read post]
17 May 2008, 5:30 pm
Lest the Supremes be accused of undue sympathy for the parents of the brain-damaged victim of the intubation-gone-awry, they again instruct the court of appeals to look for other reasons why the doctor should not be held liable.Chau v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 8:07 am by Susan Brenner
The mere fact he was employed by a government agency does not turn him into a part of the `law enforcement arm of the state. [read post]