Search for: "State v. Force" Results 1621 - 1640 of 32,523
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am by INFORRM
In the case of R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058) the Court of Appeal held that the live automated facial recognition technology (“AFR”) used by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was unlawful as it was not “in accordance with law” for the purposes of Article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The Hobby Lobby majority forced RFRA into a violation of the separation of church and state with this element of its reasoning. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 3:39 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
We are happy to report that the Department of State has released an important announcement that describes the agency’s compliance with the recent court ruling, Gomez v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 10:32 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Thys, contemplate the following from Monell, 436 U.S. 658, 695 (1978) :Although we have stated that stare decisis has more force in statutory analysis than in constitutional adjudication because, in the former situation, Congress can correct our mistakes through legislation, see, e. g., Edelman v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 10:17 am by tjsllibrary
References Forced entry: Is a controversial state law a missing piece in treating mental illness? [read post]