Search for: "U. S. v. Doe" Results 1621 - 1640 of 5,554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In the other the actor has such knowledge, or reason to know, of the facts, but does not realize or apprecia [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Aromino v Van Tassel ;  2011 NY Slip Op 51058(U) ; Decided on June 6, 2011 ; Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Richmond County ; Straniere, J. points out a plethora. [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 5:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Lutin v Perlberger 2024 NY Slip Op 31879(U) May 29, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 158734/2023 Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Jonns v Fischbarg  2019 NY Slip Op 31919(U) July 3, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150729/2017 Judge Kathryn Freed gives a nice cogent explanation of two recurring legal malpractice principles. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Jonns v Fischbarg  2019 NY Slip Op 31919(U) July 3, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150729/2017 Judge Kathryn Freed gives a nice cogent explanation of two recurring legal malpractice principles. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 2:20 am
 Rien Broekstra and Gaëlle Béquet of Brinkhof (Amsterdam), who represent Wiko in the parallel Dutch litigation, are the authors.On 30 October, the higher regional court (“OLG”) of Karlsruhe handed down its first decision on the merits on FRAND (case number 6 U 183/16) since the landmark CJEU ruling in Huawei v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Entities subject to the Open Meetings Law and the Freedom of Information LawMatter of Reese v Daines, 2008 NY Slip Op 51879(U), decided on September 15, 2008, Supreme Court, Erie County, Patrick H. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Halperin v Held & Hines, LLP 2024 NY Slip Op 31415(U) April 12, 2024Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 652124/2019Judge: Andrea Masley is another in a long line of New York legal malpractice cases arising from real estate troubles. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm by Josh Blackman
In neither of them does our opinion contain any aside about how reasonable the President's position was. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 4:55 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
This court agrees with Starmark.Yes, there was reference to i4i:This court has long held that because “[u]nder 35 U.S.C. [read post]