Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2018, 8:30 am
Today, Stone Brewing is one of the largest breweries in the United States and its beer is sold on five continents…. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:59 pm
In the 1871 case of United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 8:55 am
United States by the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:02 am
But it -- like the other Ninth Circuit opinion this morning -- contains a new "Summary" section that looks very much like the "Syllabus" in opinions of the United States Suprme Court. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
In short: no trade, no trademark.Two US Court of Appeals opinions have created the possibility that a plaintiff could bring a passing-off action based on use of its trademark outside of the United States only – a powerful new tool for challenging infringers that are first to use the trademark in the United StatesFollowing the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Lexmark International, Inc v Static Control Components, Inc (572 US ___, 134 S Ct 1377 (2014)),… [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 7:10 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:28 am
Both men came to the United States as young children, Mark from South Korea and Richard from Jamaica. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:05 am
Hodge ... and United States v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 8:36 pm
(Mark Tushnet has a post raising similar questions.) [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:59 pm
Mark S. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 6:10 am
Government Protect Congolese Immigrants in the United States? [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 8:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:58 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
It also suggests the extent of the uniqueness of the premises that mark the boundaries of judicial power and their role in government and with law. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 8:27 am
An earlier post on this blog by Mark Tushnet explained that Justice Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am
United States, in which the justices held that a judge’s simultaneous service on two military courts does not violate the dual-officeholder ban. [read post]
16 May 2023, 4:00 am
We affirm the three-judge panel’s Harper v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 am
In support of this opposition, eBay cites Perfumebay.com Inc. v. eBay Inc., 506 F3d 1165 (9th Cir., Nove. 5, 2007) where the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals stated that the term "BAY" was the dominant portion of the eBay mark. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:00 am
A short per curiam opinion issued yesterday by the United States Supreme Court concerning an employment dispute in Oklahoma is likely to result in consternation in California. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:44 pm
" Id. at 409 (quoting United States v. [read post]
