Search for: "X, Y "
Results 1621 - 1640
of 4,307
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2015, 7:51 am
Debo insistir en este análisis pues existen personas que piden un debate técnico, incluso internacional (bueno el que propuso lo último es un idiota redomado los otros por el dinero que cobran), el asunto es muy sencillo: Las AFPs captan los aportes de sus clientes por “x” números de años –lo ideal, para ellas, sería que sean no menos de 40- a los que se suman las ganancias y se restan las pérdidas de… [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 12:37 pm
” President Obama’s statement was in the form of: “Every time X happens, I say Y. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 6:16 am
Ahora tragó saliva, y pagó (y no está mal que se la cobren). [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 1:43 pm
., where defendant agreed to plead guilty to X offense, in return for Y sentence, but now seeks relief (as authorized by Proposition 47) to reduce the X offense to a misdemeanor and hence only have to serve a sentence of less-than-Y.So does the passage of Proposition 47 allow the prosecution to retroactively withdraw from the plea agreement, even after the defendant has (as here) served years in prison, or do we assume that both parties (the prosecution and the defense)… [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
X rather than to Mr. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 7:16 am
Didn't predict X? [read post]
It's not too hard to follow the political sleight of hand when it's Bernie Sanders prestidigitating.
15 Nov 2015, 6:29 am
Invite the audience to think that X and Y are really the same thing. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 5:52 am
This comes up with warnings claims all the time—plaintiff says the warning was inadequate as to the risk of x but the plaintiff claims her injury was y—but also applies to design defect claims. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:49 am
Y’know. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 7:32 am
Netflow records "Computer X talked to computer Y at time T, transferring this many bytes", while DNS logs say "Computer X looked up name N". [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 4:29 pm
Section 2 of the Representation Agreement Regulationdefines routing management of the adult’s financial affairs as follows:2 (1) For the purposes of section 7 (1) (b) of the Act, the following activities constitute "routine management of the adult's financial affairs":(a) paying the adult's bills;(b) receiving the adult's pension, income and other money;(c) depositing the adult's pension, income and other money in the adult's accounts;(d) opening… [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm
When the Supreme Court of Canada says “X” in 2007, and repeats “X” in 2011 adding explicitly that “X does not mean Y but means Z”, it is reasonable to assume (is it not?) [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 8:23 am
He just said, "The laws say one thing"—and mind you, these are criminal laws; these are laws that say if you do X, Y, and Z, you will go to prison. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 8:20 pm
The allegations were Y. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
One day they're working at firm X but the next day, firm Y. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 7:07 am
Should the legal profession begin including direction in medical power of attorney or other marital agreements regarding “at the time I need significant care, I wish for my own care x, y, z and I wish for my spouse a, b, c? [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am
The Panopticon blog has a post about the decision in W, X, Y and Z v Secretary of State for Health, Secretary of State for the Home Department and British Medical Association [2015] EWCA Civ 1034 concerning the sharing of medical information. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 11:36 am
So, on one level, my hat's off to Judge Ikuta for dissenting notwithstanding the more difficult path that the futile articulation of her position requires.But, on the other hand, you've got to reflect at least a tiny bit when you're the only person on an 11-member panel -- one composed of very smart people -- that thinks a statute clearly says X, when to a person everyone else says that the statute clearly says Y. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:00 pm
La demande contenait deux revendications indépendantes 1 et 8 portant sur la même application médicale de la même substance, l'une rédigée dans le format "suisse" (utilisation de la substance X pour la fabrication d'un médicament pour le traitement de la maladie Y), l'autre rédigée selon l'Art 54(5) CBE (substance X pour le traitement de la maladie Y). [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 2:51 pm
A state court can say, "We find that procedure X violates provision Y of the United States Constitution. [read post]
