Search for: "Akins v. State"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 3,090
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2013, 9:19 am
The case, Wyeth v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 8:35 am
This week, the Ohio Supreme Court issued a sharply divided 4-3 opinion in Freshwater v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:00 am
Furthermore, as noted by the California Supreme Court in Brinker v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm
Yet laws like those at issue in Arizona v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 4:29 pm
Furthermore, as noted by the California Supreme Court in Brinker v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 4:29 pm
Furthermore, as noted by the California Supreme Court in Brinker v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 1:08 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada released its unanimous decision in R. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:24 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 1:14 pm
Thus, a timely protest is an essential prerequisite for relief under a CPL 330.30 (1) claim of an error of law, unless the error has deprived the defendant of a fundamental right akin to People v Davidson, People v Padro and People v Antommarchi. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 3:51 pm
In April of this year, the Supreme Judicial Court explicitly stated in Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 7:45 am
American Manufacturing Co., United Steelworkers v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 11:30 am
Ever since the Seventh Circuit decided PepsiCo v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:47 pm
Second, the United States Supreme Court has "insisted that the discretion of the official in the field be circumscribed as held in Delaware v Prouse. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 11:39 am
Based on Domestic Relations Law § 170[7] and as discussed in Granger v Granger, the court observed that the State of New York has approved of "no fault" divorces. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 12:07 am
Let me weigh that up for a minute….Money v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:00 pm
Prosecutors are given wide latitude in their summations to comment upon the evidence, but they must not abuse this right by overstepping the boundaries of fair comment akin to Williams v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
Equally fortunately, I can confidently state that none of the programs we will be discussing today were within my purview when I was at the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:57 pm
See Dickinson v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:34 am
Center v. [read post]
