Search for: "BR "
Results 1641 - 1660
of 2,897
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2012, 11:18 pm
Br. for Pet’rs at *17-19, Amgen (No. 11-1085), 2012 WL 3277030 (U.S. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 6:28 am
These stages of life are considered normative for brāhmanas or brahmins. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am
See Anderson Br. 47, 51; Griswold Br. 26. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:38 am
As to inventor testimony:Moreover, contrary to Cook’s argument, an inventor’stestimony that “there is nothing novel about [the sheathmovement],” J.A. 1510, taken alone, neither “establishe[s]the invalidity of the patent on obviousness grounds” norconstitutes a “material false statement[] to the [US]PTO,”Appellant’s Br. 27, 28. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 12:31 pm
"This is partly a matter of playing the role of Br'er Rabbit to Trump's Br-er fox (setting aside the racial aspect of that parable). [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
In Worlds v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:53 am
Former GuestKat Mirko Brüß analyzes a very interesting recent German decision, which has tackled the application of such exclusive right in the context of linking within online image sharing service Pinterest.Here's what Mirko writes:German court: copyright infringement by ‘re-pin’ on Pinterestby Mirko Brüß A Kat pinReaders of this blog will remember the CJEU decision Renckhoff (C-161/17), which was discussed by Eleonora here. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 9:36 pm
Appellant’s Br. 10, 20. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:11 pm
</span></p><div style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px;"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><br/></span></div><div style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px;"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">No Refusal Weekends, it turns out, aren’t much different -- except that it’s their way… [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 12:00 pm
Via 1709 Blog friend Mirko Brüß (Waldorf Frommer Rechtsanwälte) comes the news that a German court (though not the one that had made the Mc Fadden reference) has recently applied the CJEU judgment, and the principles laid down therein [Mirko also wishes to let readers know that a new reference on the right of communication to the public and filesharing was made by the Regional Court of Munich on 17 March last (Case No. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 1:48 am
In a paper setting out FICPI's argument, the authors (Robert Watson (GB), Jérôme Collin (FR), Ivan Ahlert (BR), Philip Mendes da Costa (CA), Michael Caine (AU), Jan Modin (SE) and James Pooley (US)) argue that the supposed disadvantages of the grace period, primarily that it would create too much uncertainty for industry, are not borne out by empirical evidence. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:23 am
As the NRA notes in its brief, former Governor Andrew Cuomo has stated that “firearms advocates ‘have no place in the state of New York’” Pet’r’s Merits Br. at 8. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 5:46 pm
See Appellant’s Br. at 23–30.For the most part, we disagree. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 12:40 pm
Appellant’s Br. 19. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:32 pm
§ 41.79(b).PTO Br. 24. [read post]
14 May 2019, 11:12 am
Footnote 11:Because Appellants predicate their obviousness arguments upon their assertion that the “PTAB’s erroneousconstruction infected its analysis of obviousness,” Appellants’ Br. 35, we need not separately address Appellants’conditional invalidity arguments, see Knowles, 886 F.3d at1373 n.3 (“Because we conclude that the PTAB did not errin its construction of the disputed limitation, we need notaddress the appellants’ conditional arguments as… [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 6:01 am
Today, Oxford University Press launched Oxford International Organizations (OXIO), an online research database led by editors-in-chief Jean d’Aspremont (Univ. of Manchester & Sciences Po), Catherine Brölmann (Univ. of Amsterdam), & Iain Scobbie (Univ. of Manchester). [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:02 pm
.* The 1709 blogAfter the first application of the CJEU’s GS Media decision in a Swedish court (see IPKat's report here), Mirko Brüß (Rasch) discusses its first application by the German courts.Is the songwriters’ right to call for a reversion of copyright after 35 years inalienable or not? [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 3:00 pm
" [Appellant's Br. at 36.] [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 6:14 pm
Appellant’s Br. 12, 17–18, 23. [read post]
