Search for: "Corporations A, B, and C"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 7,267
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm
See Corporation of the City of Burnaby [1974] 1 CLRBR 1, at para. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:07 am
” From this uncontroversial premise, however, she concluded that “there is no reason, in principle, why ‘private [nonstate] actors’ excludes corporations. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:06 am
Grossly simplified, most CACs say something like this: We can modify the bonds with the affirmative vote of holders of X% in aggregate principal amount of the affected bonds, except that modifications A, B, or C require the affirmative vote of holders of X+Y% in aggregate principal amount of the affected bonds. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 3:45 am
Key Variables and Values for Domestic and Cross-Border EATRs, United Kingdom and United States Notes: (a) Reflects the federal corporate tax [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 10:31 am
Testimony by Expert Witnesses A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if: (a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and (d) the… [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 2:48 pm
Should the Corporation be a C Corporation or an S Corporation for income tax purposes? [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 8:24 am
The primary battleground in the fight for non-economic damages is part (b), which involves more subjectivity than parts (a), (c), and (d). [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 2:03 am
In addition to providing filing relief to certain companies, the SEC’s press release reminds companies of their disclosure obligations: For example, where a company has become aware of a risk related to the coronavirus that would be material to its investors, it should refrain from engaging in securities transactions with the public and to take steps to prevent directors and officers (and other corporate insiders who are aware of these matters) from initiating such transactions until… [read post]
Supreme Court of the State of Delaware, Germaninvestments AG, v. Allomet Corp., Docket No. 291, 2019
4 Mar 2020, 12:54 pm
C. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 5:52 am
Richard B. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am
§ 3729-3733(1)(A)-(D), the government can use a Civil Investigative Demand to require a person: (A) to produce such documentary material inspection and copying, (B) to answer in writing written interrogatories with respect to such documentary material or information, (C) to give oral testimony concerning such documentary material or information, or (D) to furnish any combination of such material, answers, or testimony. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:32 pm
§ 780.105(c). [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 1:56 pm
Notably, the bill also imports the GDPR’s concept of “sensitive data,” defined as “(a) personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, religious beliefs, mental or physical health condition or diagnosis, sexual orientation, or citizenship or immigration status; (b) the processing of genetic or biometric data for the purpose of uniquely identifying a natural person; (c) the personal data from a known child; or (d) spec [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 10:59 pm
Successful resolution of an international arbitration for a C-level executive of a Korean conglomerate. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 7:45 pm
Richard Janda explains the outcome in the McGill Journal of Sustainable Development Law, An Act respecting Corporate Accountability for the Activities of Mining, Oil or Gas in Developing Countries (Bill C-300) was not doomed to failure, but by galvanizing corporate resistance its adoption became a David vs. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:00 am
If it’s any consolation to Louisiana’s most Googled d-lister, he’s not the first celebrity to run afoul of Section 17(b) of the Securities Act for touting a digital deal. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
Continuing our annual tradition, we have compiled our top developments and headlines for 2019 & 2020 in trade secret, non-compete, and computer fraud law. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 6:09 am
The latest case, A. and B. against Croatia, introduced a security safeguard. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:44 am
The only prohibition is that a parent may not cause ‘physical harm’ as that term is defined in R.C. 2901.01(C). [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:01 am
Franks: we don’t see impact b/c we deal with adult victims, not trafficking but privacy. [read post]
