Search for: "DUKE v. STATE"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 2,007
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2012, 7:08 pm
Bell (1927) and Skinner v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
Schleicher v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:24 am
See Conte v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:29 pm
Dukes, the class action employment discrimination case against the retail giant that Court watchers have been eyeing for months. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term
Commencing March 4, 1877
1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 7:32 am
**Frakes and Wasserman had discussed "cohort effects" in 65 Duke L.J. 1601 (2016) :The numerous hiring-year coefficients presented in Table A1 are meant to be interpreted with reference to the omitted hiring-year cohort - that is, the 1993 cohort. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
Learn more about the plaintiffs in Alasaad v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 7:26 am
Several pre-selected opinions (Loving v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
Learn more about the plaintiffs in Alasaad v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:06 am
In the Microsoft v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:46 pm
Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2011. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:47 pm
Dukes, 131 S. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:30 pm
An example is Ciraolo v. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 5:54 pm
See Justice Scalia's lone dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 9:30 am
Book Chapters: Rishi Batra, Integrative v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 10:30 am
Murphy’s article Abandon Chevron and Modernize Stare Decisis for the Administrative State is cited in the following article: Heather Elliott, Gorsuch v. the Administrative State, 70 ALA. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:24 am
Duke Power Co., 401 U. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:38 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
In a recent essay in the Duke Law & Technology Journal, Maura R. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
