Search for: "Does 1-27"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 12,435
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2013, 11:35 am
The employer does not reduce the reportable cost for income imputed to the employee for the coverage (such as coverage for domestic partners or adult children over 27). [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 7:47 pm
Slip op. at 22-27. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am
United States, 19-7862Issues: (1) Whether, because the age at which a capital defendant became intellectually disabled does not bear on his moral culpability, the U.S. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:38 am
§ 1295(a)(1) (2012). [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 1:20 pm
I was struck by two things: (1) The absence of any reference at all to trade agreements, the WTO or principles of trade law. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:17 pm
(Docket No. 1 ¶ 5.) [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:51 pm
" (The Pfizer vaccine does have full FDA approval.) [read post]
22 May 2017, 10:21 am
WA Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence: In an 8-1 decision announced Friday, the Washington Supreme Court upheld the death sentence of Cecil Davis for the 1997 murder of Yoshiko Couch. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 11:58 am
State Farm further contends that its underinsured-motorist policy does not violate Indiana Code section 27-7-5-2. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 8:14 am
and LinkedIn Does KM?. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 11:01 am
The board concludes therefrom that GSK Biologicals does not constitute an incorrect designation of the opponent. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 6:15 am
Elovitz, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, on Monday, July 27, 2020 Editor's Note: Brian T. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 11:22 pm
Carlos Alberto Rodriguez, 27 was drinking at a strip club and says he does not remember the crash. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:04 pm
Demonstrably intoxicated defendant (.27% & .33%) could consent to a search. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 9:41 am
Briefs are due November 27. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 7:21 am
If the New York state legislature does not extend Insurance Law § 2335, it will sunset or expire on July 1, 2011. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 9:29 pm
1. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 12:55 am
., Nov. 27, 2007), the court, in a 2-1 decision, held that Long Branch, NJ did not violate the section when under a redevelopment plan it excluded churches and religious assemblies from an area zoned for entertainment and recreation.The court held that the "equal terms" provision does not require a church to show that a "substantial burden" has been been placed on its religious exercise. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 4:20 am
But the court does not believe the distinction is material, and the omission of the hotel information does not amount to a material omission. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:34 pm
Aug 27: In the U.S. [read post]
