Search for: "FELLOWS v. STATE" Results 1641 - 1660 of 4,570
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Both the claimant and a fellow female employee were romantically involved with a third, male employee. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:36 am by John Jascob
Furthermore, while the trial court clearly erred in instructing the jury on state of mind, the error did not “seriously impair” the integrity of the proceedings (U.S. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
The consensus falls apart over the merits of Selikoff’s actual research, his credentials, and his advocacy tactics.[1] Selikoff’s collaborators, protégés, and fellow travelers tend to brand any challenge or criticism as “scurrilous. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 7:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
I do not believe that the standard of care required of a medical practitioner has been more clearly or succinctly stated than by Lord Hewart C.J. in Rex v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 5:47 am by Ben Allen
  According to the Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:20 am
Cantor on whether all US patent issues, including claims under State law, should be heard by the Federal Court. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 9:25 am
As is well established, judgments delivered in exercise of powers under Article 142 are not precedent and are generally not relied upon as having laid down principles as has been confirmed recently in State of Punjab v Rafiq Masih. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 1:11 am
One of the most cheerful souls you are ever likely to encounter in the often oh-so-serious world of intellectual property is this Kat's friend and fellow blogger Tania Phipps-Rufus. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:08 am by Jeremy
For those who enjoy a more detailed and lucid account of this Opinion than this blogger can provide, fellow blogger Eleonora -- a talented linguist as well as a copyright enthusiast -- has posted this analysis on the IPKat. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
With Black people holding power in the Republican Party, it is Robert who helps John land his appointment to the Supreme Court.At first, John is awed by his fellow justices, but the country is changing. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 3:21 am
   This year's first day of the new term saw the re-argument of Sessions v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Greiner submitted an Affidavit stating he wouldn't solicit or hire IBM employees for almost two years. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
From In Custodia Legis (the blog of the Law Librarians of Congress): "Witchcraft and a Haunted Case of Torture in Joost de Damhouder’s Praxis Rerum Criminalium (1555)"; How a House Becomes Legally Haunted: Stambovsky v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Ralph Richard Banks, Standford Law, asks, Brown v. [read post]