Search for: "Felts v. Felts" Results 1641 - 1660 of 9,275
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2020, 1:28 pm by Ashoka Mukpo
But this ruling represents a disturbing milestone: For the first time since 1973’s landmark Roe v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
”  It was assumed that such adaptation would invoke Article V at the national level. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 8:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Here's an excerpt from a 2016 Ninth Circuit oral argument in an employment discrimination case, Reynaga v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Ba ba ba, bye BabybelFromageries Bel v J Sainsbury Plc [2019] EWHC 3454 (December 2019)Fact of the day: I don’t like cheese (you could say I’m not fondue it). [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
The only alternative route would be to employ the test for the recognition of foreign custodial orders set out by the Privy Council in C v C (Jersey) [2019] UKPC 40, which focuses on questions of public policy rather than the child’s welfare. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 12:34 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Nike lost on long felt but unmet need:Accordingly, we affirm the Board’s determination thatNike’s arguments and evidence failed to demonstrate along-felt but unmet need for substitute claims 47–50. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 7:31 am by Florian Mueller
Still, it's a concession that a patent was weak in the first place.Originally, it looked like the period between December 2019 and May 2020 was going to be an extremely busy one for the Nokia v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 12:00 pm by Giles Peaker
James v Hertsmere Borough Council (2020) EWCA Civ 489 What can be addressed in a section 204 Housing Act 1996 appeal of a review decision? [read post]