Search for: "London, Appeal of" Results 1641 - 1660 of 5,581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The High Court in London has handed down a judgment establishing that, as a matter of English law, a company can be held vicariously liable in respect of data breaches caused by its employees. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 29 November 2017 the Supreme Court heard the appeal in the “forum shopping” case of Goldhar v Haaretz. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 7:58 am by Giles Peaker
London Borough of Haringey v Ahmed & Anor (2017) EWCA Civ 1861 This was Haringey’s appeal of a High Court decision dismissing Haringey’s claim for possession against Ms Ahmed (our report here). [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
Do you think London cabs have such a distinctive character enough to hold a trade mark? [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
” The City of London issued a proposal to ban fast food restaurants within 400 meters of schools. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:59 pm by Giles Peaker
Central London County Court, 15 November 2017 (Not on Bailii. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:16 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
The council lost at both County Court and Court of Appeal levels because there had been no act of surrender, the note merely having been left up in the common parts to notify other residents and the council were not entitled to infer surrender from that. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
  The Factums (Skeletons) on the appeal can be found here. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 3:14 am
Kat Annsley talks about Court of Appeal’s decision Actavis v ICOs  in The rise of "obvious to try" is over as Court of Appeal finds CIALIS dosage regimen patent obvious.Weekly roundups: Wednesday WhimsiesTwo Never Too Late are Better than One! [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 3:00 pm by EEM
Event & opportunity:CFP: The Return of Sanctuary Cities: The Muslim Ban, Hurricane Maria, and Everything in Between, Detroit, 23 March 2018 [info]- Submit abstracts by 3 December 2017.Talk: Aid and Multilateralism in an Era of Populist Politics, London, 7 December 2017 [info]- Will also be livestreamed.Publications:"Appeals Court Partly Reinstates Trump’s New Travel Ban," New York Times, 13 Nov. 2017 [text]Asylum Outcome Continues to Depend on the Judge Assigned… [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
In the case Stringam Denecky LLP v Sun Media Corporation, 2017 ABQB 687 B A Browne J allowed an appeal by a columnist against an order that would obliged him to reveal the identity of his source. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am by Hanibal Goitom
Merton London Borough Council, [1978] A.C. 728, a parent company has a duty of care when: (1) “the harm complained of is a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the alleged breach; (2) there is sufficient proximity between the parties that it would not be unjust or unfair to impose a duty of care on the defendants; and, (3) there exist no policy reasons to negate or otherwise restrict that duty. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am by Hanibal Goitom
Merton London Borough Council, [1978] A.C. 728, a parent company has a duty of care when: (1) “the harm complained of is a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the alleged breach; (2) there is sufficient proximity between the parties that it would not be unjust or unfair to impose a duty of care on the defendants; and, (3) there exist no policy reasons to negate or otherwise restrict that duty. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:12 am by Paul T. Moura and Lorelie S. Masters
  For example, the New York Court of Appeals rejected a literal application of the “total pollution exclusion” in Belt Painting v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:12 am by Paul T. Moura
  For example, the New York Court of Appeals rejected a literal application of the “total pollution exclusion” in Belt Painting v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 1:09 am by Jani Ihalainen
After a defeat at first instance, The London Taxi Company pursued the matter further into the Court of Appeal, who rendered their decision very recently.The case of The London Taxi Corporation Ltd (t/a the London Taxi Company) v Frazer-Nash Research Ltd dealt with, as mentioned above, EU and UK trademarks over the design of the London black taxi (EUTM 951871 and UKTM 2440659). [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 1:06 pm
The judgment concerns an appeal from a decision of Arnold J on a preliminary issue [2016] EWHC 2220 (Pat), regarding the construction of a California law governed patent cross-licensing agreement containing a covenant not to assert patents against third parties. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am by Lorelie S. Masters
  While it may appear odd to require parties to a contract governed by New York law to arbitrate their disputes in London, there are historical reasons for this procedure. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am by Lorelie S. Masters and Paul T. Moura
  While it may appear odd to require parties to a contract governed by New York law to arbitrate their disputes in London, there are historical reasons for this procedure. [read post]