Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 5,813
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
The Administrative Law Judge found, upon the hearing, that a preponderance of the evidence showed that the petitioner committed a category three act of neglect (see Social Services Law §§493[3][a][i]; [4][c]; 494[1][a]; 14 NYCRR 624.5[j][1][i]; 700.4-700.5). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:38 am
In Matter of Capital Enters. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:01 am
Suggested Reading (this is a fairly large sample of the relevant philosophical literature):Abramson, Jeffrey B. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am
But as a general matter, a decision not to do business with someone, even when it is politically motivated (and even when it is part of a broader political movement), is not protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 5:54 am
Paragraph 1(b) is more difficult. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:15 pm
Working sessions Working sessions K: Grievances Concerning Pure Academic Matters Part 2. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:24 am
For more examples of this national trend, read the discussion of actions taken by Houston’s Kim Ogg and Philadelphia’s Larry Krasner, among others, in Davis, Angela J. [read post]
30 May 2019, 1:09 pm
From within Papst:The Supreme Court in B & B Hardware noted as a general matter that the Restatement standards allow for someexceptions to issue preclusion even when the above-quotedconditions are met. 135 S. [read post]
29 May 2019, 10:15 am
In 2015, the Commission charged Christopher J. [read post]
25 May 2019, 10:01 am
See Utah Code J. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
This is amply demonstrated by Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. v Pollack 2019 NY Slip Op 50793(U) Decided on May 17, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Reed, J.. [read post]
23 May 2019, 5:26 pm
DONALD J. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
But the dispositive legal issues in the case may have ramifications that go beyond the employment context because they involve matters of common-law contract law; specifically, the element of a meeting of the minds in the absence of a formal written contract executed by both parties. [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm
”6 B. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
20 May 2019, 5:49 am
How time flies! [read post]
20 May 2019, 3:10 am
Nov. 27, 2018) (Lefkow, J.). [read post]
19 May 2019, 1:05 pm
See 2 J. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Apr. 26, 2019).While the resolution of the case pivots on issues of contract law in the leasing context, the lengthy portion of the opinion addressing the matter of attorneys fees [see cut & pasted below] will have much broader impact across a wide array of practice areas. [read post]
17 May 2019, 6:06 am
Statement on Proposed Amendments to Sarbanes Oxley 404(b) Accelerated Filer Definition Posted by Robert J. [read post]
