Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B" Results 1641 - 1660 of 3,062
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  SeeRestatement (Second) of Torts §134 & comment b (1970).Restatement of TortsThe heeding presumption is derived from language in Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A, comment j (1965) that dealt with the opposite situation − presuming that an adequate warning, when given, will be read and heeded. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:24 pm by J
(c) The second problem comes with what might be called “totting up”. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
 After an detailed discussion of the matter Justice Slade DBE held that that German law applied because England was not the common habitual residence of the parties at the time of the accident. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:25 am by Veronika Gaertner
Hochtief) confirms the consolidated case law on art. 5(1)(a) Brussels I Regulation regarding the contractual nature of the matter. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 2:24 pm
I thought I’d pass along this very interesting article by Judge Andrew J. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
TM is concerned with one kind of generalization: source information—who is responsible b/c of the presence of mark. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 2:23 pm
§ 285; and (j) An award of Plaintiffs' costs and expenses in the action. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:50 am
 Juror C then announced that `no matter what happens, my verdict is for guilty. [read post]