Search for: "Matter of G. C. ," Results 1641 - 1660 of 4,011
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2017, 9:00 pm by Nico Cordes
Amendments (Articles 100(c) and 123(2) EPC)(...)2.5 For these reasons the amendments made to claim 1 are based on the application as filed.3. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by INFORRM
A third is a recognition that, as the … [Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights] put it in Hrico v Slovakia 49418/99 (2005) 41 EHRR 18, [2004] ECHR 365 (20 July 2004) [40](g) “There is little scope under Article 10(2) of the Convention for restrictions on … questions of public interest …”. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 1:15 am by Jeroen Willekens
As a matter of fact, the Enlarged Board has analysed and endorsed the established jurisprudence in point 26 of the reasons for the decision:"... [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:13 pm by Marie-Andree Weiss
Until 31 December 2017, an agent compliantly registered in either the old directory or the new directory will satisfy the online service provider’s obligation under section 512(c)(2) of the DCMA. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm by Barry Sookman
  As public transportation developed the practical matter of establishing the terms of the agreement arose. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
(g) The evidence was clearly presented and easy to follow (albeit 15 pages long). [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 10:38 am by Ron Coleman
 But it sounds right to me, as does Julie’s point about the application of all this to social media, both as a matter of the logic of the FTA’s rules and its own interpretation of those rules: [G]iven the influence of social media stars . . . [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 8:30 am by MBettman
”) R.C. 149.43(C)(1) (Noting that a person allegedly aggrieved by the failure of a public office to promptly prepare a public record may bring suit. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 1:48 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
" (Federal crimes of terrorism are defined by 18 USC § 2332b(g)(5), which lists a series of grave offenses ranging from bombing to hostage taking).The artifacts have not yet been seized by American authorities, and they are not located on US soil. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 11:51 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
 In G 2/12 and G 2/13 (decision, blog), the Enlarged Board of Appeal concluded that the exclusion of essentially biological processes for the production of plants in Article 53(b) EPC does not have a negative effect on the allowability of a product claim directed to plants or plant material such as plant parts. [read post]