Search for: "Michigan v. United States"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 3,728
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2012, 1:59 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed a jury verdict of over $33 million in a breach of contract case tried before a jury in the Western District of Michigan. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
NOTE: The Supreme Court case set for argument on Wednesday, Sept. 9, Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 10:09 am
Attorneys Award for “Superior Litigation Team” in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:34 pm
Advocates v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:05 am
It's snowy and cold today in the Eastern United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:03 pm
The official case name is United States of America v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm
United States (10-5443) and Wal-Mart v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:22 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:08 am
First, in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:32 pm
United States, 2012-1 Trade Cases ¶77,830. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:04 am
In its May 2022 ruling in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 12:48 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
Four years later, the Supreme Court revisited the issue in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
. — F.Supp.2d —-, 2007 WL 43747 (S.D.Ohio) United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Sec US Dept Ed Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitR. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 5:55 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 3:58 am
Vigilance from the bench relative to the collection of fines is one thing; but incarceration of a defendant that lacks any ability to pay constitutes a debtor's prison.Incarceration for the inability to pay fines and costs was proscribed by the United States Supreme Court in the 1983 case of Bearden v Georgia. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 11:21 am
Smith had failed to establish that the decision of the Michigan Supreme Court “involved an unreasonable application of clearly established Federal law as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States” — the standard of review for habeas petitions after the enactment of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 5:16 am
In this declaration, Patterson explained that the database at issue `consisted of telecommunications metadata obtained from United States telecommunications providers pursuant to administrative subpoenas served upon the service providers under the provisions of 21 U.S. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 2:31 pm
People v Scott, Michigan Dept of State Police v Sitz, Indianapolis v Edmond, People v Jackson and People v Trotter settled that a roadblock or checkpoint stop is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
