Search for: "Patrick v. State" Results 1641 - 1660 of 2,575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm by Don Cruse
Grants of Review TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF AGING AND DISABILITY SERVICES A/K/A BRENHAM STATE SCHOOL, ANTHONY V. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 10:16 am by Giles Peaker
On a) the first instance Judge had correctly held that there were deficiencies in Reading’s formal Equality Act assessment, but also correctly found, following London & Quadrant Housing Trust v Patrick (2019) EWHC 1263 (QB) (our note) that the PSED did not have to be in the form of a single formal exercise. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 11:56 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Discusssion with staff reflected that there had been some shortage and that one dorm lost both the JCO V and VI" (which are supervisory positions)." [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 1:53 am
Kerin.Representing Appellee (Plaintiff): Patrick J. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
All seven state ballot measures considered following the Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 7:16 am by Aaron Rubin
” Based on such alleged overreach, a group of Arizona booksellers, publishers, librarians and photographers filed Antigone Books v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:54 am by Anna Christensen
  The blogosphere reported yesterday that Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, has condemned the ruling as the Court’s most partisan since 2000’s Bush v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
On cert., the state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:12 pm by Dennis Crouch
  Apple’s petition attracted four amicus briefs, including a bipartisan brief from Senator Patrick Leahy  (D) and Congressman Darrell Issa (R). [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:31 am by Cody M. Poplin
In Defense One, Patrick Tucker describes how the Burr-Feinstein encryption resembles Chinese law. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 4:31 pm
Case Name: City of Gillette v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:22 am by William Ford
Alan Rozenshtein flagged a forthcoming article he wrote for the Yale Law Journal Forum arguing that the Supreme Court was wrong to conclude that the government needed a warrant to collect large quantities of cell-phone location data in United States v. [read post]