Search for: "People v. Sample" Results 1641 - 1660 of 1,949
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2010, 12:16 pm by Robert Oszakiewski
To retain respect for sausages and laws, one must not watch them in the making Prince Otto von Bismarck On April 22, 2010, Rep. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am by Stephen Page
By virtue of Section 32DA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 :-(i) “In an Act, a reference to a de facto partner is a reference to either one of two persons who are living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis who are not married to each other or related by family;(v) For sub-section (1) – (a) the gender of the persons is not relevant…. [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:59 am
Last week, in the wake of the State Supreme Court's ruling in Brayton et al. v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 1:32 pm by Mirriam Seddiq
  There was one who misunderstood Arizona v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 12:30 am by Bystander
There is the Cracknell v Willis defence of challenging the breath machine (not much help in a urine sample case though) and myriad technical issues.I have seen offers of courses in motoring law for solicitors that make the point that this is one of the decreasing number of areas where the private individual is prepared to shell out hefty fees to try to stay on the road. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:50 am by Daniel Schwartz
We've got a good cross-sampling of the different types of approaches people took. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Eriq Gardner at THR, Esq. has the story, as does Ray Beckerman at Recording Industry v. the People. [read post]