Search for: "Stanford Law Review"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 3,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm
If courts find that a rule violates a procedural requirement, the APA does not require courts to vacate the entire rule, Charles Tyler of Stanford Law School suggests in an essay. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 8:30 am
Note — This post arrives (along with many more) thanks to Zach Young, a Cincinnati native and rising 2L at Stanford Law School, where he studies as a Knight-Hennessy Scholar. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:48 am
We Need A Tax Professional To Run The IRS - Forbes Lucy Bernholz: key facts on US Foundations - out today from Foundation Center Stanford Social Innovation Review: Who Really Gets Paid In The Nonprofit World? [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:48 am
For this study, 200 law review articles were randomly selected from a pool of 30 student-edited law reviews in the WESTLAW JLR database. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 12:24 pm
Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case reviewing an interpretation by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals of the scope of the preclusive effect of the federal Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act, which precludes most state-law class actions in which the plaintiffs allege misrepresentations in connection with the purchase or sale of a covered security. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 8:47 am
Stanford student David Muraskin previews next Wednesday’s argument in Ricci v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 1:13 pm
Of interest in the law review article HOW DO PATENTS AFFECT FOLLOW-ON INNOVATION? [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 8:31 am
Diego Zambrano at Stanford Law School (dzambran@law.stanford.edu). [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
We thank Bárbara Medrado of King & Spalding for having directed us to the Stanford materials on comparative case law. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 6:49 am
Some of Calo’s recent publications are: Against Notice Skepticism, 87 Notre Dame Law Review (forthcoming 2012) The Boundaries of Privacy Harm, 86 Indiana Law Journal 1131 (2011) Open Robotics, 70 Maryland Law Review 571 (2011) People Can Be So Fake, 114 Penn State Law Review 809 (2010) [read post]
31 May 2009, 8:50 am
His work has been published in the California Law Review, Columbia Law Review, Iowa Law Review, Michigan Law Review, Stanford Law Review, UCLA Law Review, University of Chicago Law Review, Vanderbilt Law Review, Yale Journal on Regulation, and Yale Law Journal, among others. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm
Events From Archive to Database: Reflections on the History of Laws Governing Access to Information, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, 25 October 2018, 17:00 – 19:30, Woburn Suite, G22/26, Ground Floor, Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU Stanford internet and society lab – secret dockets, secret searches, 27 November 2018, 12:50 – 13:50, Room 320D, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, CA Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia … [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 11:15 am
/Ph.D. kind) for the job: Stanford Law School Professor David Freeman Engstrom whose impressive CV overflows with all the right credentials and an undeniable devotion to equal access to justice. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 5:47 pm
Sometimes, 59 Stanford Law Review 1249 (2007). [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 3:50 am
Our review led to several key insights and a more detailed understanding of what newly authorized legal service providers are doing in both Utah and Arizona. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:42 am
Rushing to catch the wave is this upcoming article in Wake Forest Law Review by criminal law professor Erin Sheley. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 10:26 pm
Thompson from the firm Davis McGrath LLC, and Lauren Gelman, Executive Director of Stanford Law School's Center for Internet and Society to discuss Viacom's suit against Google's YouTube for the violation of its copyrights in a $1 billion lawsuit. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 9:20 pm
In a forthcoming article in the Stanford Law Review, Sharmila L. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 5:22 am
Below, Brian Goldman of Stanford Law School previews Hemi Group, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2025, 8:34 am
Keep an emergency fund—include bar-exam and bar-review costs (typically ~$3–$4k). [read post]
