Search for: "State California v. Superior Court"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 3,616
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2012, 4:14 pm
The case was Britt v Superior Court. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 4:47 pm
In our last post of 2016, I was complaining about the California Supreme Court’s decision in Augustus v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 11:46 am
Superior Court, 36 Cal. 4th 148, 113 P. 3d 110 (2005). [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:54 pm
Today’s lone case for argument, Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:04 pm
Superior Court, S181712 (opinion issued 6/25/12). [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 9:24 am
The California Supreme Court ruled in the 2008 case of Ross v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 9:00 am
State of California (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 1112 and Shandralina G. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:41 pm
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 9:53 am
Justice Chaney was very well respected when she was a trial court judge in Los Angeles County Superior Court and her opinions are very well drafted and reasoned. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:30 pm
Superior Court, No. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
Bio-Rad relied upon the California’s Supreme Court decision in General Dynamics v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
Bio-Rad relied upon the California’s Supreme Court decision in General Dynamics v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 9:53 pm
Jan. 15, 2015).IssueThe question before this court is whether a California state court malpractice case involving patent law representation was properly removed to a federal court.Neurorepair, Inc., at *2.HoldingBased on Gunn v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Because the CLRA confers standing on anyone who buys a product based on deceptive marketing, regardless of whether the false advertising caused any additional injury, it was not clear to the Ninth Circuit that the designated State of California Superior Court would dismiss Plaintiff’s CLRA claim. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 6:45 am
He received a probationary sentence but has appealed for trial de novo in superior court. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm
Superior Court (2007) 41 Cal.4th 747, 758. [read post]
11 May 2020, 12:12 pm
In another recent trial court decision on SB 35 (Ruegg & Ellsworth v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 1:01 pm
Citibank, the plaintiff filed suit in California Superior Court alleging causes of action for negligence and statutory violations of Section 17200 of the California Business & Professions Code and Section 1785.25 of the California Civil Code. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 3:29 pm
Superior Court (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 317 (review denied). [read post]
