Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 1641 - 1660 of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2014, 12:00 am by My name
”[v]  As the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has recognized, “[i]n determining who is included within a defined term in the Act, the [NLRB] is accorded a substantial amount of discretion. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:53 pm by H. Scott Leviant
(April 7, 2014), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division One) affirmed the denial of a petition to compel arbitration. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 8:02 am by thatagency
  On January 31, 2017 in Washington, D.C. the United States Tax Court finally issued their final decision in case number 21276-13W v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 6:27 am by Rory Little
The Massachusetts courts chose the prejudice rule Weaver’s ineffective assistance claim was rejected at the trial court level, and the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court agreed on appeal. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 11:20 am
[Not selected for inclusion in the Official Reports, decision affirmed by the Appellate Division, 48 A.D.3d 564]In this action, State Supreme Court Justice Gerald Loehr, in an exercise of judicial discretion, imposed sanctions on Scott L. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 10:21 am by FDABlog HPM
  According to APP, “[i]n the event that the Court denies or conditionally grants APP’s pending Motion for Leave to Intervene, notice is hereby given that APP shall appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit from that Order and related rulings as well. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 2:37 pm by Florian Mueller
It's much harder to argue to an appeals court that two juries in a row were unreasonable than to say the same about a single jury.From a strategic point of view, Apple actually scored an even more important victory over Samsung on Monday with an appeals court ruling that the district court had erred in denying Apple a permanent injunction against infringing Samsung products, giving Apple a new opportunity to obtain an injunction on remand to the district… [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 6:38 am by David Pocklington
The Court rejected the State Government’s arguments. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit held in 1990). [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 3:34 pm
The district court relied on the Supreme Court’s latest discussion of the change of venue question, from Skilling v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 3:57 am by Shamnad Basheer
In an order dated March 27, 2013, the Bench comprising Justice Dharma Rao and Justice Aruna Jagadeesan stated that Sections 2(k), 85 and 87 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 fell foul of the law relating to tribunal appointments laid down by the Supreme Court in Union of India v. [read post]