Search for: "State v. Plain" Results 1641 - 1660 of 11,767
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2011, 8:56 pm
Let's begin with some background: The plain language of the original Constitution permits citizens of one state to sue other states. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 12:29 pm
United States (No. 08-108), argued earlier this Term, Nijhawan v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 5:25 am
Over the past months, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has had to open three different files in this regard, with one glorious EU country (Poland), and a couple of UK judges seeking clarification as to the lawfulness of the Directive under different standpoints [Cases C-358/14, Poland v Parliament and Council; C-477/14, Pillbox 38(UK) Limited v Secretary of State for Health; and C-547/14, Philip Morris Brands SARL and Others v Secretary of… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 3:01 pm by Kevin Russell
Akio and Fusako Kawashima, the petitioners in Kawashima v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 12:34 pm
On May 19, 2009, the Michigan Court of Appeals released its published opinion in Averill v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 10:42 am by Charla Bizios Stevens
  The Court stated its decision in plain language: “An individual’s homosexuality or transgender status is not relevant to employment decisions. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 3:21 am
Wallace dissented, arguing that the state's application of harmlessness was reasonable.U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:46 am
United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 366 F.3d 1311, 1320, 1322 (Fed. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 9:36 am
In particular, the court focused on a distinction that it had drawn in an earlier case, United States v. [read post]