Search for: "State v. Plain"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 11,767
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2011, 3:28 am
State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 8:56 pm
Let's begin with some background: The plain language of the original Constitution permits citizens of one state to sue other states. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 7:14 am
" That test draws from Baptist v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 8:04 am
Thomas (No. 09-5201) · United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 12:29 pm
United States (No. 08-108), argued earlier this Term, Nijhawan v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 5:25 am
Over the past months, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has had to open three different files in this regard, with one glorious EU country (Poland), and a couple of UK judges seeking clarification as to the lawfulness of the Directive under different standpoints [Cases C-358/14, Poland v Parliament and Council; C-477/14, Pillbox 38(UK) Limited v Secretary of State for Health; and C-547/14, Philip Morris Brands SARL and Others v Secretary of… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 3:01 pm
Akio and Fusako Kawashima, the petitioners in Kawashima v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 12:34 pm
On May 19, 2009, the Michigan Court of Appeals released its published opinion in Averill v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 5:54 am
In Saalfrank v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 10:42 am
The Court stated its decision in plain language: “An individual’s homosexuality or transgender status is not relevant to employment decisions. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:47 am
That's plain wrong. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 11:44 am
U.S. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 3:21 am
Wallace dissented, arguing that the state's application of harmlessness was reasonable.U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 7:52 am
Cir. 2010); Celgard, LLC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 6:52 pm
SEE UNITED STATES v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:46 am
United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 366 F.3d 1311, 1320, 1322 (Fed. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 9:36 am
In particular, the court focused on a distinction that it had drawn in an earlier case, United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 3:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 9:12 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]