Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Davis"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 2,078
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2009, 2:43 am
Justice Davis (joined by Justice Clifford) wanted a limitation. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
Maryland, Martin v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Parke-Davis, 733 P.2d 507, 515-16 (Wash. 1987); Bond v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46) Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46) South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP) Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns (International… [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm
” In context, this word generally (as in Articles I and II) means a state’s lawmaking system—as the Supreme Court has repeatedly held in a century-old line of cases from Ohio ex rel Davis v. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 3:14 pm
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 7:06 am
Saint- Gérard attributes this theory to American botanist Wade Davis). [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:14 am
Johnson v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:22 am
The Court in Terry v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 1:24 pm
This may be a shock to people from other states. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:30 am
See Dred Scott v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:31 am
It has been almost two years since the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Heller Ehrman v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
Journalism and the PCC There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but four “resolved” complaints: Information Affairs Authority of Bahrain v The Independent, Clause 1, 14 December 2011 ; Mrs Kate Adams-Moor v The People, Clause 1, 13/12/2011; Brent Council v Kilburn Times Clause 1, 2, 12/12/2011; Mr Will Knock v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/12/2011. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
The Court stressed that the Davis decision had found that statements made “in the course of police interrogation under circumstances objective [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
After Dillon v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 1:29 am
The LSE Media Blog has an article on the problem of misinformation and how we can mitigate its impacts by teaching people how it is created and spread. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:32 am
Davis, and NLRB v. [read post]
November Reasonably Suspicious Podcast: Let me be your lawyer dog, or I won't be your man at all ...
12 Nov 2017, 5:51 am
(See an earlier podcast segment on the topic.)Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Front-end and back-end solutions.Death and TexasUS Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Ayestas v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
The motion, tabled by David Davis MP, calls for an “end [to] this serious attack on free speech by withdrawing the proceedings for contempt; further asserts the fundamental right of hon. [read post]
