Search for: "U.S. v. Ball*"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 3,545
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2016, 11:09 am
V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418, 433 (“[T]he mere fact that consumers mentally associate the junior user’s mark with a famous mark is not sufficient to establish actionable dilution. . . . [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 2:10 am
So what I wrote a couple of days ago about how even the #1 Apple fanboy among U.S. judges (not Judge Koh; she's just the worst pro-weak-patent activist out there, definitely worse than her frequently-criticized colleagues in the Eastern District of Texas) has lost his faith in some of Apple's patents-in-suit against Samsung is not really relevant to what I think of Apple's overall outlook.My disagreement with Apple on its choice of a license for Swift also wasn't a key… [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:25 am
The use of force in self-defense, however, may not be invoked by the coastal state to compel compliance since the undersea incursion lacks the “gravity” or “effect” of a conventional armed attack, as set forth in the U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 1:01 am
In Lone Wolf v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:25 pm
At least to me.In 2014, the California Legislature put Proposition 49 on the ballot, which sought an opinion from the voters as to whether Congress should propose (and the Legislature ratify) an amendment to the U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:13 am
When The Hammonds brought this to the attention of the FWS and refuge personnel, the family became the immediate subjects of a long train of abuses and corruptions.In 1987 a U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 11:33 am
Reminds IPBiz a bit of Game 7 of Mets v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 4:30 am
Lanx, Inc., 2015 U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:04 am
The full U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:50 pm
This morning, the U.S. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm
Bollinger and Grutter v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
https://t.co/80gI93fnmZ -> Bell appeals CRTC ruling forcing company to sell fibre internet access to small ISPs https://t.co/bPpIts12vV -> ECHR finds interception of mobile communications in Russia violated privacy rights ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
U.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964). [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 1:58 pm
On Sunday night, U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
https://t.co/80gI93fnmZ -> Bell appeals CRTC ruling forcing company to sell fibre internet access to small ISPs https://t.co/bPpIts12vV -> ECHR finds interception of mobile communications in Russia violated privacy rights ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:48 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Green v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:19 pm
They could be only the U.S. citizens. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:45 am
Rory Little previewed Mussachio v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 10:06 am
” The case is now under review in the U.S. [read post]
