Search for: "United States v. Container Corp." Results 1641 - 1660 of 2,081
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2021, 5:11 pm by Larry
This all comes up in the context of Voestalpine USA Corp and Bilstein Cold Rolled Steel LP v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 9:44 am
 One example is the distinction the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) draws between displays and advertising material. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
United States (Gray on Claims) CAFC: Orion v Hyundai on novelty: Expanding the scope of a printed publication with oral testimony (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False marking includes marking with expired patent number: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:18 am by Adam Feldman
As is usually the case, the United States is the most frequent amicus group on the merits so far this term. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Scott R. Anderson
Over the subsequent two decades, its language authorizing the use of the U.S. armed forces to “defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq” was used not just to remove the Hussein regime but also to facilitate the subsequent occupation of Iraq, including the assumption of responsibility for Iraq’s internal and external security. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:44 am by Russell Knight
United States, 417 US 85 – Supreme Court 1974 Even a third-party to the third-party preventing compliance with a subpoena can result in a contempt finding. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 1692a(6).In Henson, the United States Supreme Court specified that it would only determine whether the defendant was a debt collector pursuant to the second definition of section 1692a(6), i.e., whether the "statutory language defining the term `debt collector' [] embrace[s] anyone who `regularly collects or attempts to collect . . . debts owed or due . . . another.'" 137 S. [read post]