Search for: "United States v. David"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 6,864
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2019, 6:01 pm
As I'm sure you've all heard by now, the President of the United States issued a series of grotesque, race-baiting, xenophobic (not to mention factually inaccurate) tweets this morning.Of course he did. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm
The panel, made up of Judges David Tatel, Patricia Millett and Neomi Rao, was uniformly skeptical of Consovoy’s arguments. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 12:21 pm
With a new judge presiding, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 9:23 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 9:23 am
State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:10 am
In the Paoli Railroad yard litigation, plaintiffs claimed injuries and increased risk of future cancers from environmental exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 1:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 12:03 pm
And virtually none of the applications originating in China are “triadic patents” (patents filed jointly in the patent offices of Japan, the United States, and European Union), which are widely considered “the gold standard” for patent protection. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:51 am
Sen. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 9:24 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm
United States The Judge has reduced the damages in the Oberlin college libel case from $44m to $25m to comply with various limits laid down in Ohio law. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:03 am
” At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, Suzanne Luban looks at United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
United States—flew under the radar perhaps because it was decided narrowly; the Court upheld the discretion enjoyed by the U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Larry Lessig is clearly one of the most interesting and imaginative scholars within the legal academy, and he has written a book that fully vindicates the enthusiastic blurbs it receives (from myself, as well as others). [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
In Rucho v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Section One straightforwardly provides: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Moving beyond the bare text, it is important, even (maybe especially) a hundred years later, to think more about what the Amendment really sought to constitutionally accomplish, and how its full import has not been deeply understood. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:29 pm
The chief justice says that Justice Neil Gorsuch has the opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
The justices held 5-4 in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
WadeandPlanned Parenthood v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 6:40 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
