Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2023, 5:16 am
And in the Flatow case, known as Flatow v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 10:14 am
In Chutter, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 10:14 am
In Chutter, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am
BackgroundIn 2008, Yannick Noah, a French former tennis player, registered the following figurative sign (the Mark) as a European Union trade mark (EUTM), in respect of a number of categories of goods, including leather goods, clothing, games and playthings (the Registration): In 2019, Noah Clothing LLC, a clothing company based in the United States, filed an application with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) seeking revocation of… [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:45 am
” United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 5:48 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:55 am
Holder Suisse S.A. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 10:44 am
The Act clarifies that it is "widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 5:36 am
It claims that once plaintiffs left the United States, Mr. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 2:55 am
See, e.g., Beds & Bars, 122 USPQ2d at 1551 (finding BELUSHI’S to be primarily merely a surname despite only five persons in the United States with that surname). [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 8:22 am
" (internal quotation marks omitted)); United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 10:29 am
Chooseco LLC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 7:00 am
Department of State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 1:29 pm
Holly Hill Fruit Prods., 75 F.2d 13, 15 (5th Cir. 1935); see United Drug Co. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 3:20 am
§ 1746, the following language may be used for unsworn declarations executed outside the United States: "I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. [read post]
29 May 2018, 11:44 am
United States. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 3:04 am
Jacobs v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:51 pm
Earlier today, Mark Tushnet posted about Justice Thomas’s recent eye-opening concurrence in the Court’s denial of cert. in McKee v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
Whatever your feelings about the doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales], it's a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 11:15 am
It owns three United States registrations for the trademark SWATCH. [read post]
