Search for: "United States v. Sessions"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 3,253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2017, 1:26 pm
By Little V. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:01 am
United States, Frohwerk v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
He has also cited and relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:59 am
Contents include: Studies in International Law and Organizations Ernest Petrič, Principles of the Charter of the United Nations – Jus Cogens? [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 6:20 am
Exit polls show that some 70% of Americans oppose deporting undocumented immigrants working in the United States. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 5:25 pm
The SG is the Justice Department’s third in command and is responsible for representing the United States before the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 6:01 pm
This year was one of the busiest in recent memory when it comes to cryptography law in the United States and around the world. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
To achieve the vital goal of substantially reforming existing food systems in the United States in the context of changing climatic, political, and sociolegal conditions, the panelists will articulate their visions of the centrality of interracial justice to confronting food oppression and cultivating Furthering Liberty for People With Disabilities Post- Meyer v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 pm
Douglas, in Doe V. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 pm
Douglas, in Doe V. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:50 pm
State and Folsom v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
Lewis was among those legal advisors disqualified by the order: “We just stopped working on anything involved with United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:35 am
That means that longstanding precedent, such as Roe v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 12:23 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
Referendums in the UK are not legally binding, although Parliament may be morally bound to follow their results. 14:08: Dominic Chambers QC begins by addressing Lord Carnworth’s question from the previous session, in relation to the Youssef case, before continuing with Stage 3 of his submissions – in the absence of Parliamentary authorisation to nullify or override the statutes, the Executive will be acting unlawfully. 14:04: The afternoon session is about to… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 2:43 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:04 am
We previously reported that on November 22nd, Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas granted a nationwide injunction precluding the Department of Labor from implementing and enforcing the regulations on November 22nd in Nevada v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm
On the same day the House of Lords Communications Committee will hold evidence sessions with IPSO, Hacked Off and others to discuss developments in press regulation. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 3:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
