Search for: "Waits v. State"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 10,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am
United States, and its significance in deciding this case questioning how long a traffic stop can be extended to wait for the drug dog to show and do as he’s told: The apparent confusion in the courtroom was useful in one respect: It illuminated the cluelessness of Chief Justice John Roberts when it comes to traffic stops. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 8:45 pm
We've had a chance now to read - no, make that "study" - the Wyeth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm
Vullo decision, where it held that the NRA had stated a claim for impermissible censorship due to government jawboning. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
One did not have to wait long for this process to begin. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 12:33 pm
Sackett v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 4:52 pm
In McGill v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 10:51 am
Dusty (pictured below) arrived at that number by excluding all 2011 opinions captioned "State v. ____. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 8:30 am
ESRT Empire State Building, LLC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
Goodman v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:24 pm
The suit was filed in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a court that has previously ruled in favor of the league on similar disputes (in NBA v. [read post]
17 May 2009, 7:39 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 10:14 am
New York State Court of Claims: DePaula v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 11:59 am
” Murphy v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:50 pm
Third, there was the fact that Mr Niemela had waited 2 years to apply for an interlocutory injunction. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 2:23 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 6:23 am
Ontiveros v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:04 pm
Apparently unable to wait any longer to share the good news, on Friday the Court granted cert. in thrice-relisted Plumhoff v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 10:01 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Co. v Maryland Cas. [read post]
31 May 2016, 1:47 am
Recently, in United States v. [read post]
