Search for: "Williams v. Federal District Court" Results 1641 - 1660 of 3,646
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2007, 1:04 pm
Remember, 18 million Americans used marijuana at least once in 1997.The extent to which drugs have permeated our community was noted by the Chief Judge of Florida's Third District court of Appeals back in 1991 when he wrote that trace amounts of cocaine may be found innocently on "almost everything in South Florida", Jones v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Michael William McConnell of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, arguing on behalf of plaintiffs-appellees Bard and Goldfarb, won an affirmance of a District of Arizona finding of willfulnessin patent infringement. [ BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 10:10 am by Eugene Volokh
District Court in Manhattan on charges of racketeering and operating a continuing criminal enterprise—the so-called federal narcotics 'kingpin' law. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm by Timothy Zick
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
17 May 2020, 2:42 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
To be clear, there may be good reason for the district court to grant the Government's motion to dismiss in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 5:26 am by David Oscar Markus
Let's see what happens.Big reversal in the Second Circuit yesterday in US v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:47 am by Stephen Wermiel
The procedures followed may be decided by the special masters in each case, and the Court has held that the Federal Rules of Evidence are only guidance in original cases. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm by Michael O'Brien
In order to give the federal district court jurisdiction to hear the petition, the trial court, and state appellate court must have arrived at a decision contrary to federal law. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:24 am by John Bellinger
  Affirming a district court decision by Richard Roberts, the DC Circuit — in an opinion by Chief Judge Sentelle, joined by Judges Rogers and Williams — recites at considerable length the reasons for judicial caution in recognizing new causes of action under the ATS, as set forth in the Supreme Court’s decision in Sosa. [read post]