Search for: "French v. French" Results 1661 - 1680 of 5,360
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2018, 11:13 am
This is probably the highest amount ever awarded by a French court as an advance payment on damages in a patent infringement case. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:44 am by Hannah Kris
United States in the Trump v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
(ii) Does the French [Republic] have any kind of prior intellectual property right [in] the word ‘France’, which is not the official name of the French State and is just a geographical entity? [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Mark Walsh
The case for moot court this year was Carpenter v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
British Columbia (Attorney General), 2017 BCCA 264 (37790) French in B.C. courts. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 11:34 am
OrlanLast month, the Paris Court of Appeal handed down its decision in the case between Lady Gaga and the French body and performance artist Orlan (Paris Court of Appeal, 1st ch. 5th pole, 15 May 2018, No 16/1477: Porte k/a Orlan v Germanotta k/a Lady Gaga and others). [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 3:01 pm by scottgaille
  The Howey Test, deriving from a decades-old case, Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Daily Signal, Elizabeth Slattery and Scott French weigh in on last week’s cert denial in Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Washington went down to a surprising defeat in his first election, and he spent the next three years fighting in the French and Indian War. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Law Society Gazette has a comment on the recent decision of Warby J in the case of Sube v News Group Newspapers that headlines such as Shameless French family-of-10 demand MANSION’ did not pass the threshold for serious harm in the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
31 May 2018, 6:15 am
’ (at 450 – later citing Bauman v Fussell [1978] RPC 485)However, the Court does not deal with the question of paparazzi photography head on, and nothing in the judgment expressly confirms that the photograph commissioned by The Sun enjoys copyright. [read post]