Search for: "HILL v. STATE"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 5,319
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2010, 8:04 am
(Morningred v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 12:58 pm
Or so said the court in Hill v. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 11:13 pm
Judge Batts didn’t buy the argument, and made several findings (some competely incorrect ), including: XM is operating as a traditional radio broadcaster, but by broadcasting and storing music, XM was both a broadcasting and distributing, while only paying to broadcast (traditional radio pays no fees); and Comparing XM+MP3 players to a cassette recorders, she stated that it was “manifestly apparent that the use of a radio-cassette player to record songs played over free… [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 5:04 pm
But Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who in 2000 joined the majority in Hill v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 1:26 am
As Hill J in Aldi Stores Ltd Partnership v Frito-Lay Trading Co GmbH [2001] FCA 1874, [30] stated: In most, if not all cases, the question whether there has been use as a trade mark will be determined by an objective examination of the use in the context in which it appears.His Honour, in considering whether consumers would perceive the name Delphine as a badge of origin, stated: … the context or setting in which consumers viewed the EDMs [electronic… [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:17 am
UNC-Chapel Hill is a state university, so it is subject to the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of legal equality. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Commentary on Horne v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
Timlin v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:53 am
Harris and Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:05 am
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 6:38 am
NOURSE, IN RECKLESS HANDS: SKINNER V. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 4:30 am
Shelnutt's trial began, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 3:55 pm
Supreme Court, opinion & dissent, 5/29/07 United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:30 pm
Jacoby v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:52 am
Sure issued his decision in Regan v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:19 am
Instead, the Court emphasized, the proper test is found in Hill v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 5:32 am
(Hill v Church of Scientology of Toronto, 1995 CanLII 59 (SCC), [1995] 2 SCR 1130, at para 196)[40] In the present proceeding, the Court is of the opinion that, in light of the facts of the case, the damages alleged by Ms. [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:04 am
Hill, 750 F.3d 982 (U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:54 am
McGraw-Hill Cos., 2007 U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Yesterday’s oral arguments in FCC v. [read post]
