Search for: "Hill v. State"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 5,350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2021, 2:20 pm
Hill 20-1587Issues: (1) Whether a state may require convicted sex offenders to obtain and carry a state identification bearing the words “sex offender” without facially violating the First Amendment’s prohibition on compelled speech; and (2) whether a convicted sex offender has a First Amendment right not to be prosecuted for fraudulently altering a state identification card after scratching off a statutorily required sex offender designation. [read post]
28 May 2021, 2:20 pm
Hill 20-1587Issues: (1) Whether a state may require convicted sex offenders to obtain and carry a state identification bearing the words “sex offender” without facially violating the First Amendment’s prohibition on compelled speech; and (2) whether a convicted sex offender has a First Amendment right not to be prosecuted for fraudulently altering a state identification card after scratching off a statutorily required sex offender designation. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:17 am
Responses to last week’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
30 Nov 2024, 9:14 am
From Hill v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:00 am
Klaine v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 5:48 am
Hill-Rom Co., 108 F.3d 799, 804 (7th Cir.1997). . . . [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:02 am
” The third case granted on Friday was United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 12:58 pm
Or so said the court in Hill v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:55 am
Hill delivered the decision.J. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 8:04 am
(Morningred v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 11:55 am
Justice Hill concurs in part and dissents in part, with whom Justice Burke joinsCase Name: CARLA STALCUP v. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 11:13 pm
Judge Batts didn’t buy the argument, and made several findings (some competely incorrect ), including: XM is operating as a traditional radio broadcaster, but by broadcasting and storing music, XM was both a broadcasting and distributing, while only paying to broadcast (traditional radio pays no fees); and Comparing XM+MP3 players to a cassette recorders, she stated that it was “manifestly apparent that the use of a radio-cassette player to record songs played over free… [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 5:04 pm
But Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who in 2000 joined the majority in Hill v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:17 am
UNC-Chapel Hill is a state university, so it is subject to the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of legal equality. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 1:26 am
As Hill J in Aldi Stores Ltd Partnership v Frito-Lay Trading Co GmbH [2001] FCA 1874, [30] stated: In most, if not all cases, the question whether there has been use as a trade mark will be determined by an objective examination of the use in the context in which it appears.His Honour, in considering whether consumers would perceive the name Delphine as a badge of origin, stated: … the context or setting in which consumers viewed the EDMs [electronic… [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 6:38 am
NOURSE, IN RECKLESS HANDS: SKINNER V. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
Timlin v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 4:30 am
Shelnutt's trial began, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Commentary on Horne v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:30 pm
Jacoby v. [read post]
