Search for: "ISRAEL V. STATE" Results 1661 - 1680 of 1,761
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
” So held the Appellate Division, Second Department in its April 24, 2019 decision in Mizrahi v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:30 am by Kenneth Anderson
His wife was also a diplomat (whether from State or DEA or USAID, I don’t recall). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Rachel Kleinfeld
Supreme Court had taken on new powers (in their case, the power of constitutional review) in the 1803 case, Marbury v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
No, (probably) said the Appellate Division, First Department, in its April 6, 2017 decision in Keller-Goldman v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:14 pm by Jim Walker
” The Tribune writes that Carnival executive Giora Israel (Carnival Corp. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 2:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s February 2018 decision in Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:45 am by Emma Snell
Wanda Vázquez Garced was arrested yesterday on bribery charges, the Justice Department has said. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 11:57 am by Bill Otis
Unlike my drug legalization debate with Professor Doug Berman at Ohio State, the Hawaii event was not videotaped. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
The Statute passed in New York State in August 2022 is part of a legislative package to “honor and support Holocaust survivors in educational, cultural, and financial institutions,” and to put forth paths to improve education about the Nazi period.[10] The Claims Conference: Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, an organization that secures material compensation for Holocaust survivors around the world, produced a study in 2020 that examined the knowledge of… [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 4:14 am by Emma Snell
The lower house, the State Duma, yesterday voted unanimously to authorize the illegal annexation, Russia’s state-run TASS news agency reported. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]