Search for: "In Re IT Group, Inc., Co." Results 1661 - 1680 of 2,431
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2007, 12:11 am
The mandamus opinion In Re: Volkswagen of America Inc., which re-asserted that trial courts must consider a "100-mile threshold" between a suit's existing venue and a proposed venue, could slow tort suits in the district, which is popular with plaintiffs. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 7:31 am by The Editors
Paul is a lawyer, Affinity Consulting Group partner and a past chair of ABA TECHSHOW. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:50 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
Mesa Petroleum Co., 493 A.2d 946 (1985), as a proper exercise of business judgment. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
Gilliam(Seattle Trademark Lawyer) District Court E D Wisconsin: Another cautionary tale of joint website ownership: Third Education Group, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:04 am by Peter J. Sluka
  This week’s post takes us to the halls of Delaware Chancery Court, where a recent decision from Vice Chancellor Laster, In re Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores, Inc. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC vacates FTC’s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (Philip Brooks), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Hal Wegner), (IPBiz), (IP Law360), UK Court of Appeal rules on whether prior art not in the same design field… [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:14 am by Terry Hart
Random House, Inc. and New Era Publications International ApS v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
Washington Beef is owned by AgriBeef Co., a privately-held company in Boise, Idaho. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 1:43 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employers looking for cost-effective opportunities to sweeten the perceived value their compensation and fringe benefit packages periodically should re-examine their policies for reimbursement of employees for ordinary and necessary business expenses an employee incurs in connection with the performance of his duties, such as: Required work clothes or uniforms not appropriate for everyday use. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
The doctrine of inherent anticipation (particularly after Schering Co. v Geneva Pharmaceuticals Inc. et Al., commented here - see also, in the UK, Merrell Dow v H N Norton & Co), may lead to similar distortions. [read post]