Search for: "In re: Davis v." Results 1661 - 1680 of 1,772
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Andrew Appel
I’ll bet that Secretary of State Raffensperger now appreciates why the Federal Court forced him to stop using those DRE machines (Curling v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
(Laura Empson of Cass Business School gave a particularly nice presentation on this at lunchtime Thursday, positing that useful ways of thinking about partnership might be as analogous to The Three Musketeers, to Henry V's famous "band of brothers" speech before the Battle of Agincourt, to a buccaneer pirate ship, or, at last, to "Gone With the Wind. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am by Dennis Crouch
  In re TC Heartland, LLC, No. 2016-105, at 10 (Fed. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Joel R. Brandes
Such hearing shall only be held if:(i) the person is related to the child as described under paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of subdivision three of section four hundred fifty-eight-a of the social services law;(ii) the child has been temporarily removed under this part, or placed pursuant to section one thousand fifty-five of this article, and placed in non-relative foster care;(iii) the relative indicates a willingness to become the foster parent for such child and has not refused previously to be… [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am by Jay Pinho
If we’re able to agree as well as they did, I’d say we’re doing all right. [read post]
A Response to Masterpiece Cakeshop In the case before the Supreme Court, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
And also, a starkly different holding from the Tenth Circuit in the wake of Egbert v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:56 am by Samuel Bray
The bucket we're in is the concurrent jurisdiction of equity. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
 Elsewhere, the Court of Justice of the European Union has defined, re-defined and refined its own and (perhaps) our understanding of what the right of 'communication to the public' under Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive actually is. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
We’re not certain that the choice as between these kinds of formulations in the Seventeenth Amendment was intentional, but on its face Jones’s reading of the Amendment’s words is at least plausible, and perhaps even the most natural.But we note that in 2014 in NLRB v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Evan Davis, Partner, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, and former Counsel to then New York State Governor Mario M. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:21 am by WSLL
Davis, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Defendant): Diane Lozano, State Public Defender, PDP; Tina Kerin, Appellate Counsel; Eric M. [read post]