Search for: "Johnson v. Long" Results 1661 - 1680 of 2,623
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Why did he spend months growing a long flowing beard, with matching fingernails? [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
Former Pentagon General Counsel Jeh Johnson is, at this hour, giving this speech at Fordham Law School in New York: Keynote address at the Center on National Security at Fordham Law School:  A “Drone Court”: Some Pros and Cons by Jeh Charles Johnson[1] March 18, 2013 [preliminary extemporaneous remarks] Thank you for this invitation. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am by Stephen Page
In a decision akin to that delived by the Court of Appeal, a Queensland Magistrate has helped set out the test for domestic violence cases under that State's Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 10:18 pm by Shouvik Kumar Guha
Next it was Aparajita’s turn to come up with an incisive case review of Lupin Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:02 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
(Doorey)  Johnson & Johnson Ordered to Pay $8.3 Million in Hip Implant Case Can an iPhone App Improve Your Legal Writing? [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:59 pm
Jury: Clear Message The California jury sent a clear message today that Johnson & Johnson and DePuy put profit over safety by awarding Loren Kransky, the plaintiff in the California case of Kransky v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:57 am by Marissa Miller
  The decision is consistent with a long line of cases that have insisted on evidence of injury before a suit can go forward, particularly when the suit implicates national security concerns. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:49 am
An 11th Circuit Court of Appeals case that originated from the Southern District of Florida, (Johnson v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 3:44 pm by Steve Vladeck
As I noted then, the Attorney General’s invocation of the balancing test for due process articulated in Mathews v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am by Bexis
  [many citations omitted]  We could go on, but there is no need to pile up further citations to show that Conley’s “no set of facts” language has been questioned, criticized, and explained away long enough. [read post]