Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 6,272
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm
When the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 5:09 am
The style of the case is, Felecia D.Davis v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
In Davis v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Barry & Jennifer Levi, Blatt v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
The Media Law Podcast’s analysis can be found here. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am
On 17 July 2014, Nicola Davies J handed down judgment in the case of Building Register Ltd v Mark Weston ([2014] EWHC 2361 (QB)). [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:38 pm
But no DC v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
Exeter Law Group LLP v Immortalana Inc. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
Davis and Hill v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In Part One, we laid out the larger First Amendment framework in which the dispute might be located and discussed how the Court’s language and reasoning in Hazelwood School District v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:10 pm
[Post by Venkat] Melkonian v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 11:00 pm
It is considered the leading authority on intellectual property law and rights protection in Europe, providing comprehensive and detailed analysis of patents, trademarks, copyright, designs, and plant varieties, as well as intellectual property and free movement of goods, IP and technology transfer licenses, horizontal agreements and vertical agreements, competition law, Euro-defences in IP actions, Procedures and remedies for enforcement of IPRs, Border controls and… [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 11:07 am
Joby Lee Teal v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:33 am
Davis, in the U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:33 am
Davis, in the U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:33 am
Davis, in the U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 4:07 pm
Davis L. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:05 am
Abortion Law in the Global Context, (American Constitution Society Issue Brief, August 2018).Clarke Forsythe, A Draft Opinion Overruling Roe v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
In my previous post, I argued that Collins was wrong as a matter of domestic law, and of European law, and that Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2016] QB 1003, [2015] EWCA Civ 311 (27 March 2015) and Case C–362/14 Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (ECLI:EU:C:2015:650; CJEU, 6 October 2015) illustrated the EU law points and undercut the reasoning in Collins. [read post]
